Customer Success Stories

Vayoom has been successfully deployed across multiple industries including automotive, industrial, aerospace & defense, medical devices, and other workflow based industries.

EXPLORE INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS

At Vayoom, we empower businesses to navigate challenges, optimize operations, and achieve measurable results. Leveraging deep expertise in manufacturing, finance, and operational excellence, we craft industry-specific strategies that transform obstacles into opportunities. Explore several case studies that highlight our innovative solutions and showcase how we drive efficiency, profitability, and sustainable growth across diverse sectors.

Case Study 1: Met Demand at Lower Cost

  • Tier 1 automotive supplier of safety critical parts
  • Cost of production exceeded negotiated price
  • At risk of losing contract
Met demand at lower cost

O V E R V I E W

Production rate of 68-78 units/hr. was below the required 87 units/hr. Customer wanted 95 units/hr. extending production to weekends.

3 prior studies found no viable solution without capital investment. Each using bottleneck analysis approach over-estimated throughput. A new custom designed welder to increase throughput did not solve the problem either.

C H A L L E N G E S

  • Cost over budget
  • Customer wanted increased production
  • Tension with labor for fatigue and injuries

B E F O R E  V A Y O O M

  • 20% shortfall in capacity
  • Negative net income
  • Increased workman compensation cost

A F T E R  V A Y O O M

  • 26% higher productivity
  • 3% EBITDA improvement
  • Reduced labor injury rate

Case Study 2: Increased Flow & Flexibility

  • Tier 1 automotive supplier of pickup truck axles
  • Changes in market challenged demand and product mix
  • Rigid high-speed line lacked flexibility to respond

O V E R V I E W

Changes in product demand and mix reduced profits significantly on a multi-product line. The process needed optimization for new market dynamics with lower demand and new product mix.

The current level of automation limited the ability to accept new products. Reconfiguration needed to deliver process flexibility and better financials.

C H A L L E N G E S

  • Rigid automation
  • Process not receptive to new products
  • Financial performance

B E F O R E  V A Y O O M

  • 50% drop in product demand
  • Slow speed to market for new products
  • Negative net income

A F T E R  V A Y O O M

  • 5.9% reduction in cost
  • $752K savings in net operating cost
  • Faster speed to market
Increased flow and flexibility

Case Study 3: Realign Flow for Growth

  • Tier 1 automotive supplier of drivetrain components
  • Best performing strategic plant with $130M revenue
  • Unable to create capacity for growth
Realign flow for growth

O V E R V I E W

Well run plant with robust continuous improvement programs. Had harvested large gains but reached upper limits and unable to find required annual cost giveback savings.

Future demand was growing but constrained by lack of available capacity and rigid automation. Growth required additional ~$3M investment.

C H A L L E N G E S

  • Finding contractual cost savings
  • No open capacity
  • Large growth CapEx need

B E F O R E  V A Y O O M

  • 18% EBITDA
  • High indirect cost
  • Rigid automation
  • Needed additional capacity

A F T E R  V A Y O O M

  • 23% EBITDA – gain of 30%
  • Eliminated CapEx need
  • Rationalized workflows
  • Flexible demand driven scheduling

Case Study 4: Bankruptcy to Profitable

  • $32M manufacturing SME purchased out of bankruptcy

  • Healthy customer orders but unable to deliver

  • Unrealistic prices based on old cost assumption

O V E R V I E W

Customers were leaving because of poor on-time delivery and quality. Company was losing more quotes than winning. Overall mismanagement led to bankruptcy.

Production was misaligned with demand creating excess inventory. Product prices were incorrect due to under-estimating operations effort and cost.

C H A L L E N G E S

  • Incorrect costing and unsustainable margins
  • Lack of processes & systems
  • Poor management

B E F O R E  V A Y O O M

  • Negative EBITDA
  • >$1M shipments late by over 60 days
  • 2 customer launches failed
  • $4K daily scrap

A F T E R  V A Y O O M

  • 9% EBITDA in 9 month
  • Reduced late deliveries by 96% in 2 months
  • Cashflow positive in 90 days

Bankruptcy to profitable